Platonic remembrance

Why do things evolve?

Is it, because evolution allows the finite to approach the infinite and the complete lies beyond the finite?

I doubt it, methinks the complete is finite itself, because it singles out a state of being among its possible states and being consists of relations, which are summed up in it, and hence the sum is actual, meaning that only if the infinite was actual the complete could be infinite. But if the infinite was actual, there would be no need to approach it through the finite.

Either way there not being a reason to approximate the complete, why does rapprochement occur?

If leaving and entering the complete were themselves parts of an ordained cycle, at least there was a reason for the movement we observe. And there was a reason for having the feeling to have already seen the things we see. In any case, whatever the context of déjà-vus might be, I've grown convinced they deal with mistakes and their avoidance, like when you're playing Giana Sisters and you arrive at that point, where you have to jump within a frame's precision. Déjà-vus likewise mark critical stages, telling you whether you just missed or hit something. If we just missed something, more emptiness will ensue, if we just hit something, we can continue our pursuit.

And knowing the economy of recollection, the last decisions before the aim will be the ones best remembered. We anticipate the form, but we have to fill it with substance. Actually, we realise we just did when we are having a déjà-vu, sufficiently or insufficiently.

The form however is the idea immortally engraved in our souls.

Such is the guidance, such is the advent and, most importantly, such are the aims, lest we are fooled to pursue deserts.