"Why AP says it goes to Sanders"

Having heard Alex announce that he'll publish a special report on the California Democratic Primary, which was held on June 7th, 2016, and which Clinton reportedly won 53:46 over Sanders, I started sifting through the videos that Alex published since until I finally found this report titled Breaking Secret Group Running U.S. Elections Discovered as opposed to, say, How Clinton Stole California From Sanders and in it I finally, that is to say at 29:32, came across what appears to be some substantial information.

The report.


The information.

You wanna know when they said the AP met the day before the California primary, the key final primary, and decided Bernie Sanders, you know, AP: Why AP says it goes to Sanders is the head-line, AP, and they said: Oh, we went to a superdelegate meeting in a rich guy's house and they just said they weren't going to go for Sanders so it didn't matter, so we asked: Who is for Sanders, who wasn't? and then collated it and it was Hillary winning by 60-something percent. And that was in the New York Daily News.

Still, I don't know whether there's anything suspicious here and won't until I have the AP report lying before me. So, the report is at http://bigstory.ap.org/779b7012af24446289623a968926ec04 and in it it says

AP count: Clinton has delegates to win Democratic nomination

WASHINGTON (AP) — Hillary Clinton has commitments from the number of delegates needed to become the Democratic Party's presumptive nominee for president, and will be first woman to top the ticket of a major U.S. political party. An Associated Press count of pledged delegates won in primaries and caucuses and a survey of party insiders known as superdelegates shows Clinton with the overall support of the required 2,383 delegates. Now the presumptive nominee, she will formally accept her party's nomination in July at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia.

and the New York Daily News did indeed comment on it: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/king-hillary-clinton-not-won-democratic-primary-article-1.2664569.

So, Alex is almost stunningly wrong about the details, starting with mistaking Clinton for Sanders. The "Gestalt" however of what he says is believable enough, only that there is nothing in terms of evidence here to support an actual vote theft.