"Maailma suurim lobamokk" or "Der Prinz mit den Eselsohren" of course in English!
I usually don't state my opinions, but showcase ways to look at things. Even in the previous, somewhat padded post I followed a common theme, namely the source of being disturbed by what somebody else says or does.
I basically never agree with the American spin on anything. Neuro-linguistic programming, for instance, is Plato's dialectic, and gaslighting is simply the purposeful mockery of somebody else's difficulty to comprehend, why somebody else is doing, what he's doing, like a kid who doesn't understand why other kids should find it amusing to fool him, and kids do that all the time and no one ever trained them in psychological warfare.
This difficulty, then, causes a feeling of disturbedness (ger. Verstörtheit), but it is not always intended. Plato, for instance, doesn't really think that a philosopher should be like a dog and only consider the opinions of his friends, independent of whether those do him any good, nor that homosexuals are superior, because all statesmen started as male prostitutes looking for a mentor. He's having fun. But if you take it seriously, it's quite disturbing.
And in the previous post I unveiled another source of disturbedness, namely that due to different focusses people believe in different approaches. I am however an absolutist when it comes to these things, that is to say: You would not feel disturbed, if something was not wrong. It is an insight, like 1+1=2. And that means in the case in question that one focus is mistaken (cf. Luke 14:8).
However, at times I have given an overview of where I think things are going. Right now though, they're still going according to plan. Since Marjorie Taylor Greene just resigned, I think it proper to explain why I trusted her, which I have done so far only cryptically and disturbingly.
It's really quite simple. People do what they want: If they're happy, they'll preserve things, if they're unhappy, they'll change them. And only an unhappy person would seek advice from a daimon, that is, only an unhappy person would rely on a fixed compulsion (I think that fairer than obsessive) in order to give his life direction, because just like gods are role models, daimons are less impressive behaviours.
Things can still go wrong though, if the compulsion becomes cynically engaged in. But I have observed for some time that Marjorie Taylor Greene has been asserting her conscience.
On this point: Trump is bribing and blackmailing at least as much as he is being bribed and blackmailed, and of course outsiders can't see where all of this is going. On the other hand: There is really just one thing that globalists don't like, and that are tariffs.
Now, Nick Fuentes, his is the bear daimon, same as the Nashville shooter's and Philip K. Dick's, in other words an artificial intellectual rigidity of an intellect that is by nature a little too fluent.
By the way, nothing of this has anything to do with Carpenter's Prince of Darkness, about which I was writing in the previous post, that film boils down to this:
i.e. the replacement of a Christ who died to bring God into the world by one who did so He'd stay out of it, i.e. one who taught how to believe, by one whose ass is taking the spanking for us.
But back to Nick, who'll spank you for a handful of dollars instead. He's got 50,000 viewers, most of them trolls like him, probably some masochists who like to be spanked too. With an audience like that, whom could he ever invite? Either a troll on his level or a masochist. In other words, he's built a pretty inescapable cage around him.
So he appeals to pity and the self-pity of those who feel trapped as well.
However, a dreamer must purge his dreams by logic and the bear daimon may not be good enough for that, actually, isn't. So...
Tucker Carlson on the other hand is happy and tries to preserve things by being charitable. Life is good in the first half of Richard Donner's Superman. I agree, said I'd like to live in The Bad News Bears cleaning pools myself, which is basically the same thing - good, Give a Little Bit had not yet been released, but Crime of the Century, Crisis, What Crisis?, Indelibly Stamped and the self-titled Supertramp album had, although in '76 the latter would have been a little hard to come by.
Speaking of which, in his preserving way Tucker is almost as mind numbing on YouTube as on television, so I watched his interview with Cheryl Hines and in the back of my mind the thought grew that all of this sounds awfully familiar, until, around the 40 minutes mark, Tucker pointed out the importance of taking good care of a woman's feet for a happy marriage, no that was of course Christopher Walken in The Maiden Heist, Tucker just said that it's a thing, and in a burst of understanding my mind went:
Well, it will all become clear, what the problem with re-establishing a society in which people are being treated as if they were essential is, even to Tucker Carlson, namely that people don't treat anything as if it were something it is not.
Another American take I disagree with: Cringe doesn't result from something being too close to home, but from weaving the pitiful into the absurd and that's plain bad taste where not judgment.
I'll not allow myself to write something like this for some time, so: Tucker Carlson is a Charles Grodin impersonator!
The co-ordinates of Genghis Khan's burial mound are 40°41'17'' N, 105°55'14.5'' E!
It will all come out eventually.
You see, even if you said all the things that you'd ever want to tell these entertainers in their one way personal addresses, it'd be hardly anything at all compared to the briefest non sequitur: Tucker is dense, Nick melodramatic and Genghis Khan's burial mound is located 90° east of Potentia and 180° of the Statue of Liberty (well, actually of the Jersey side of the Hudson River not too far from it).
I basically never agree with the American spin on anything. Neuro-linguistic programming, for instance, is Plato's dialectic, and gaslighting is simply the purposeful mockery of somebody else's difficulty to comprehend, why somebody else is doing, what he's doing, like a kid who doesn't understand why other kids should find it amusing to fool him, and kids do that all the time and no one ever trained them in psychological warfare.
This difficulty, then, causes a feeling of disturbedness (ger. Verstörtheit), but it is not always intended. Plato, for instance, doesn't really think that a philosopher should be like a dog and only consider the opinions of his friends, independent of whether those do him any good, nor that homosexuals are superior, because all statesmen started as male prostitutes looking for a mentor. He's having fun. But if you take it seriously, it's quite disturbing.
And in the previous post I unveiled another source of disturbedness, namely that due to different focusses people believe in different approaches. I am however an absolutist when it comes to these things, that is to say: You would not feel disturbed, if something was not wrong. It is an insight, like 1+1=2. And that means in the case in question that one focus is mistaken (cf. Luke 14:8).
However, at times I have given an overview of where I think things are going. Right now though, they're still going according to plan. Since Marjorie Taylor Greene just resigned, I think it proper to explain why I trusted her, which I have done so far only cryptically and disturbingly.
It's really quite simple. People do what they want: If they're happy, they'll preserve things, if they're unhappy, they'll change them. And only an unhappy person would seek advice from a daimon, that is, only an unhappy person would rely on a fixed compulsion (I think that fairer than obsessive) in order to give his life direction, because just like gods are role models, daimons are less impressive behaviours.
Things can still go wrong though, if the compulsion becomes cynically engaged in. But I have observed for some time that Marjorie Taylor Greene has been asserting her conscience.
On this point: Trump is bribing and blackmailing at least as much as he is being bribed and blackmailed, and of course outsiders can't see where all of this is going. On the other hand: There is really just one thing that globalists don't like, and that are tariffs.
Now, Nick Fuentes, his is the bear daimon, same as the Nashville shooter's and Philip K. Dick's, in other words an artificial intellectual rigidity of an intellect that is by nature a little too fluent.
By the way, nothing of this has anything to do with Carpenter's Prince of Darkness, about which I was writing in the previous post, that film boils down to this:
i.e. the replacement of a Christ who died to bring God into the world by one who did so He'd stay out of it, i.e. one who taught how to believe, by one whose ass is taking the spanking for us.
But back to Nick, who'll spank you for a handful of dollars instead. He's got 50,000 viewers, most of them trolls like him, probably some masochists who like to be spanked too. With an audience like that, whom could he ever invite? Either a troll on his level or a masochist. In other words, he's built a pretty inescapable cage around him.
So he appeals to pity and the self-pity of those who feel trapped as well.
However, a dreamer must purge his dreams by logic and the bear daimon may not be good enough for that, actually, isn't. So...
- one man's desire to be or have a faithful assistant isn't the key to the political structure of society,
- there can be no form of inquisition, public avowing of belief or loyalty in a free society, people will just lie and do what they want anyway: Most of the 144,000 Sephardic Jews who had been forcibly converted to Catholicism during the Iberian Inquisition returned to Judaism once they had the chance, so they should know that it's pointless and not themselves pursue this course, but then again Jews do many strange things and it's generally a bad idea to take them as an example.
Tucker Carlson on the other hand is happy and tries to preserve things by being charitable. Life is good in the first half of Richard Donner's Superman. I agree, said I'd like to live in The Bad News Bears cleaning pools myself, which is basically the same thing - good, Give a Little Bit had not yet been released, but Crime of the Century, Crisis, What Crisis?, Indelibly Stamped and the self-titled Supertramp album had, although in '76 the latter would have been a little hard to come by.
Speaking of which, in his preserving way Tucker is almost as mind numbing on YouTube as on television, so I watched his interview with Cheryl Hines and in the back of my mind the thought grew that all of this sounds awfully familiar, until, around the 40 minutes mark, Tucker pointed out the importance of taking good care of a woman's feet for a happy marriage, no that was of course Christopher Walken in The Maiden Heist, Tucker just said that it's a thing, and in a burst of understanding my mind went:
There's such a shame about it!Ditto. 40 mintues! I must find some other way to waste my time, this one is killing my brain cells.
I used to think that it would feel so good.
But who's to blame about it?
So many creeps in Hollywood.
I'm in this dumb motel
near the Taco Bell
without a chance in hell
I can't believe that I'm still around.
Well, it will all become clear, what the problem with re-establishing a society in which people are being treated as if they were essential is, even to Tucker Carlson, namely that people don't treat anything as if it were something it is not.
Another American take I disagree with: Cringe doesn't result from something being too close to home, but from weaving the pitiful into the absurd and that's plain bad taste where not judgment.
I'll not allow myself to write something like this for some time, so: Tucker Carlson is a Charles Grodin impersonator!
The co-ordinates of Genghis Khan's burial mound are 40°41'17'' N, 105°55'14.5'' E!
It will all come out eventually.
You see, even if you said all the things that you'd ever want to tell these entertainers in their one way personal addresses, it'd be hardly anything at all compared to the briefest non sequitur: Tucker is dense, Nick melodramatic and Genghis Khan's burial mound is located 90° east of Potentia and 180° of the Statue of Liberty (well, actually of the Jersey side of the Hudson River not too far from it).
Labels: 41, formalisierung, geschichte, gesetze, institutionen, kommentar, präsentation, psychologie, rezension, sehhilfen, wahrnehmungen, ἰδέα, φιλοσοφία
