Groundhog Day

We're not in an infowar, we're in an acknowledgement war: mankind has to acknowledge that the age of works has come to an end and the age of wonders has to replace it.

As far as the Bible goes that means firstly to understand αἰών as age and not world. As it stands, uncovering (ἀποκάλυψις) the truth is literally seen as the end of the world. In reality, we must understand the consequences of our traditional choices to be able to choose better.

As it stands, we are ruled by theatre. The first step to free ourselves from its rule is to demand competence and that we can only do, if we pay attention to what works and what doesn't instead of trusting the experts. Critical thought has to be stimulated and reflexive deference has to be overcome. Nick Fuentes is actually a dear humanist (and I'm positively certain that he's Hetzer by now, unless there's somewhere a school that teaches his style), who's leading mankind out of punishment and reward conditioning.

Once there are no buttons anymore that the government can push to get the desired reaction without having to make a rational case, no matter what the issue may be, the first step has succeeded, and three phases have to be traversed in its course:

1. leading by example and paying attention to what works and what doesn't,
2. holding one's own in the ensuing controversy and
3. overcoming the attempted suppression.
   

Once the attempted suppression has been overcome, new steps can be taken and those three phases have to be traversed again, of course with the first phase adapted to the step in question, until, eventually, enough capabilities will have been developed to make the transition to a new governmental structure.

Right now we're already seeing the second step: Once unconventional solutions can be proposed since enough people judge their merits, such solutions must be applied and dependencies reknit so as to open a path towards freedom.

There are however many dependencies - most importantly the international trading relations tackled by Trump by tariffs and trade deals. If done right, we'd almost be free. There is however another motive why someone would want to reknit the international trading relations, not to break trade's stranglehold on the nations, but rather China's on it, and that this is likely the case is evidenced by the dash to control the flow of information by artificial intelligence, which presupposes that that flow is detrimental and why would it be, if a course towards freedom was currently being charted?

There's a possibility of a fast turn of events, if Trump stays course, but at the same time trade has other interests and it would be hardly surprising, if things took a turn in their direction at some point. This will not matter however, if by then there'd not only be a passive attention to what works and what not, but also active networking between the people pursuing the former. So, there's another step to take.

There's this idea that after your death you'll be shown what impact you had on other people. If I would be shown then that I trained Nick Fuentes' discussion skills, I wouldn't be surprised anymore. I was even hoping to achieve something like that back then, before I realised in 2014 that things would have to develop by necessity and not by my choice and that I would just have to wait and wait and wait until the world would catch up with my analysis. If the rallying cry remains No more of this bull! the people can't be defeated and if they grow vis-à-vis an evermore incompetent seeming government and circumvent its attempts to suppress them, they'll eventually have what it takes to rebuild society, just like in the film Groundhog Day.