The president that was, and is not, and yet is.

First off, let me state that offences against God are nothing special in our culture. I already mentioned Aphrodite's Child's Infinity (inspired, no doubt, by the Jesus prayer of the monks of Athos: Κύριε Ιησού Χριστέ, Κύριε Ιησού Χριστέ, Κύριε Ιησού Χριστέ ad infinitum) and just for comparison, I'll embed it here, although it's really disgusting and burdens the loading.


Secondly, I stated on November 1, 2020, that Biden's role would be to offend the sensibilities of all righteous people in order to facilitate the ascent of the beast to power and that this course should be considered the standard route. I was thinking more of international than national trouble he would create, but I wasn't prophesising, just analysing. Then, on January 23, 2021, I stated that in my understanding Steve P. just said that that was indeed the plan, though in his mind of course not to elevate the beast, P. for Pieczenik. However, around the same time, Alex Jones pushed a legend, as he called it, at which I was shaking my head, about an Ethiopian king, who wanted to reform his country, but failed to do so and had to go into exile for a couple of years, before he could return and finish the job. I was thinking: That is not what Revelation 17:8 means, it's a reference to Nero, the sixth Caesar, and not the political career of the beast. And even if it was, why would you want to establish Donald Trump in that role?

The identifying verse for the beast is Revelation 17:16, and curiously enough it has been incorrectly translated into English - and English alone. Not just in modern translations, already in the King James version. It is perfectly correctly translated into Latin or German, for instance. Anyway, the original counts and it reads:

καὶ τὰ δέκα κέρατα ἃ εἶδες, καὶ τὸ θηρίον, οὗτοι μισήσουσιν τὴν πόρνην, καὶ ἠρημωμένην ποιήσουσιν αὐτὴν, καὶ γυμνήν, καὶ τὰς σάρκας αὐτῆς φάγονται, καὶ αὐτὴν κατακαύσουσιν ἐν πυρί.

whereas the King James version reads:

And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.

καὶ means and and not upon. Donald Trump eating the flesh of New York City and burning her with fire? I don't think he qualifies, and neither did I think it then, though since reasons to hate her acquired he may have.

Well, it isn't certain, but likely, that the ascent of the eighth king is imminent, and that would curtail Donald Trump's prospects, if he isn't.

Yet I think that the forces behind the current influencing operation think that everything is going according to plan, and that brings me to the question what their mindset is.

Let me ask you a question: What is the beginning of our age? Is it not 1 A.D.? And what then is the end of our age? Is it not Christ's second coming? So, if you wanted to change the order of our age until Christ's second coming, wouldn't you write

NOVUS ORDO SECLI

on your seal? But if you would object to the order by which Christ is to return, the order of the ages, that is, you would not write that. So it does make sense to cast Donald Trump in the role of the beast.

Just another middle finger at the Lord from a civilisation that has vowed to flip him off as long as it exists.